GPAcity /

CLEAR ANSWERS. THOUGHTFUL NEXT STEPS.

Editorial policy and review status

Show the rule, show the source, and say what is not known. Source checking is not the same as independent human review.

Evidence before school-specific claims

Use the institution’s registrar, catalog, or official academic policy. Keep campus, academic level, effective period, grade mapping, exclusions, and display behavior separate. An access date records when a source was checked, not the academic year to which every rule applies.

From a claim to a calculation

Supported rules are recorded with a policy version and linked to test fixtures. Unknown or conflicting rules must not silently become zero-point grades or generic school defaults. A limited profile may support finalized letter grades while excluding repeats and unresolved marks.

Editorial and mathematical review have different jobs

Automated tests can check arithmetic; they cannot establish that a policy applies to every student. Institution pages and guides disclose their AI-assisted status. Independent human review is still pending and is not implied by a passing test.

Changes and correction standard

A confirmed calculation change should update the source record, policy version, regression test, affected explanatory text, and change log. This is the documented maintenance standard, not a claim that a staffed editorial team or recurring review service already exists.

Contact GPAcity: hello@onoirstudio.com.

Calculation methodology · Official sources · Prepare a correction note · Privacy